hospital – European Stroke Organisation https://eso-stroke.org the voice of stroke in Europe Tue, 23 Apr 2024 06:55:58 +0000 en-GB hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 ESOC 2022 Session Report – EAN-ESO Joint Symposium: The vascular side of neurodegeneration: a preclinical and clinical perspective https://eso-stroke.org/esoc-2022-session-report-ean-eso-joint-symposium-the-vascular-side-of-neurodegeneration-a-preclinical-and-clinical-perspective/ Mon, 09 May 2022 08:49:56 +0000 https://eso-stroke.org/?p=22462 <p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – EAN-ESO Joint Symposium: The vascular side of neurodegeneration: a preclinical and clinical perspective first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
.flex_column.av-pxfofs-f8cffa300d0abe60229a0238b37e998b{ border-radius:0px 0px 0px 0px; padding:0px 0px 0px 0px; }

By Dr. Inna Lutsenko, ESO Social Media and PR Committee

@inna_lutsenko

Chairs: Jean-Claude Baron (Paris, France) and Natan Bornstein (Tel Aviv, Israel)

Changes to the Blood-Brain-Barrier in Alzheimer’s disease

Presented by Axel Montagne (United Kingdom)

There is a very dense network of small vessels in the brain, called “capillaries”, which represent 85% of the total vasculature of the brain. If you put all the capillaries which represent the brain in a row, they will be 600 km in length. One capillary usually provides the circulation for one neuron. Small capillaries, which are branching from the arteries, are surrounded with pericytes, which play a significant role: they maintain the integrity of the brain-blood barrier. The artery, branching capillaries and pericytes is a very complex neurovascular unit. Pericytes are also consisting of the different subtypes: prearterial, thin and postcapillary venule pericytes, which are having different functions.

There are a lot of papers showing that vascular dysfunction can lead to neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. Postmortem brain tissue analyses showed blood-derived molecules leaking out into extravascular space (e.g., fibrinogen), the extravascular deposits were found, pericyte coverage). New biofluid biomarkers – 1 Qaib, 1 sPDGFRB (a marker of the pericyte damage) are discovered. Neuroimaging methods are used to measure brain-blood barrier BBB, CBF, microbleeds, WML. One of the neuroimaging methods, dynamic contrast enhanced MRI to investigate subtle BBB dysfunction. After the gadolinium contrast injection, the patient’s brain is analyzed in a special color-coding MRI to measure the blood leaking fluids into the brain tissue. Increased BBB leakage was found in the hippocampus, a region critical for learning and memory, during normal aging. It worsens with mild cognitive impairment and correlates with injury to BBB-associated pericytes (Montagne et al. Neuron 2015).

In another paper Axel Montagne and his team looked at the correlation of the BBB Integrity and the presence of the APOE4 which is the major genetic risk factor for AD. Presence of APOE4 allele leads to brain-blood barrier dysfunction. Brain capillary breakdown initiates WM dysfunction, which can be reversed by limiting fibrinogen extravascular deposits. It has implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of human WM disease associated with AD and small vessels disease dementia (Montagne et al. Nat Med 2018). Leaking fibrinogen to the extravascular space is toxic to the brain.

Imaging vascular function in neurodegeneration in the human – what does it tell us?

Presented by Simon Duchesne (Canada)

The vascular wall can undergo a large number of damage, which in ex vivo imaging could be detected as stiffening, thickening, infiltrations, perivascular tissue infiltrations, demyelination, luminal narrowing and occlusion, impaired autoregulation, discrete ischaemia and discrete infarction. In vivo imaging we can confirm the following pathologies: infarcts, lacunes, perivascular spaces lesions, microbleeds, white matter hyperintensities and atrophy.

In his talk Simon Duchesne aimed to answer the following questions: 1) imaging: can we image small vessel disease disease (SVD) reliably in vivo, 2) vascular dysfunction: can we measure all presentations and 3) neurodegeneration: is it informative with respect to cognition?

In the paper “Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to aging and neurodegeneration” by Joanna M Wardlaw et.al (1) a team of international researchers highlighted the imaging changes during different forms of a SVD, such as ischaemic leukoaraiosis, subcortical leukoaraiosis, white matter lesions, white matter hyperintensity, subcortical hypertintensivity, age related white matter disease and ischemic white matter disease. In this prominent paper using MRI sequences ( DWI, FLAIR, T2, T1, T2 weighted GRE) the differential diagnosis between different types of SVD is proposed.

The precision of the brain atrophy measurement could depend on the make and model of the measuring devices used, reaching 10% differences in total brain volume across sites. To solve this issue Simon Duchesne gave the example of the developed “The Canadian Dementia Imaging Protocol:

Harmonizing National Cohorts” under his coordination (2). The advantage of this protocol is that it developed in such a way that images could look the same within different imaging manufacturers and across different vendors.

In the Canadian Consortium on Neurodegeneration in aging ongoing study there are 976 participants already enrolled from normal cognition till all the variants of the cognitive impairment based on the brain atrophy and the study will display the correlation of the images with phenotypes of the diseases leading to dementia.

In the paper “White matter hyperintensities may be an early marker for age-related cognitive decline” by Cassandra Morrison with a team examined the association between small vessel disease (CSVD), amyloid, and pTau with a collaborative influence on cognitive decline in cognitively normal older adults without subjective cognitive decline (3). In results they highlighted that “only baseline WMH load is associated with follow-up executive functioning, indicating that it may be one of the earliest pathologies that contributes to future cognitive decline”.

In his conclusion Simon Duchesne underlined that it is recommended to use the united imaging protocol when diagnosing SVD, make it harmonized, and use as many biomarkers as you can. SVD should be strongly monitored and neuroimaging should be done in vivo as it has a large impact on the future cognitive decline.

Does reversing vascular dysfunction help prevent neurodegeneration? Insights from preclinical models

Presented by Denis Vivien (France)

Tissue type plasminogen activator (tPA), a fibrinolytic, produced by our brains during stroke is activated by endothelial cells and is released in the blood flow to participate in the thrombus dilution, activating the plasminogen into the plasmine which leads to recanalisation and to the reperfusion of the tissue. The less known fact is that tPA is produced by neurons, which can store tPA in synaptic vesicles and during the repolarization neurons can release tPA into the synaptic cleft and when tPA reaches the cleft, it can interact with the glutamate and NMDA-receptors and improve neuroplasticity. But overactivation of the NMDA- receptors in stroke can provoke the neurotoxic effects of tPA. In his lab, Denis Vivien with his team developed the several molecules, the fist one is “a tPA, which can not bind to NMDA-receptors” and the second one is the monoclonal antibody Glunomab which can block the tPA binding to the NMDA-receptors. So future directions for the stroke treatment is not only using the alteplase which is already proven medication in combination with thrombectomy, but also using so called “cocktails” with N-acetylcysteine to prevent the secondary formation of the thrombi and the Glunomab to reduce the neurotoxic effects of tPA.

Do interventions to improve cardiovascular risk factors or function delay cognitive decline and vascular or Alzheimer’s dementias?

Presented by William Whiteley (United Kingdom)

Whether dementia is really preventable? With this question William Whiteley opened his talk. What is optimistic, is that dementia incidence has been falling by 13% each decade since 1998. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission suggests that ca. 40% of dementia cases are preventable, but estimated population attributable risk from vascular factors is small:

  • 5% smoking
  • 2% hypertension
  • 1% obesity
  • 1% diabetes

Causality of many risk factors is still unclear. Limitations to observational dementia epidemiology consist of confounding (education and socioeconomic status; APOE E4: elevated LDL cholesterol, reduced obesity, reduced diabetes), loss to follow up (If biased to high level of risk factors and no dementia), the measurement error (diet; blood pressure) and reverse causality. If we look at the observational prospective studies linking increased BMI with the development of dementia, then we see that studies which lasted not more than 5-7 years did not demonstrate enough casualty and the studies which followed patients over 15 years demonstrated the increasing the dementia rates over time in subjects whose BMI was > 25 and this casualty seems to be true.

According to some studies (4), there is a steep correlation between elevated blood pressure and the risk of dementia, but significant in the young age, while in older age there is no such an association and the similar findings were displayed with a stroke as an outcome, though Hughes with a team demonstrated in the metaanalysis that for blood pressure lowering RR is 0.87 (95%C| 0.78, 0.97) for dementia prevention.

There are no significant changes while using statins on the long-term dementia prevention and REWIND study of diabetes control showed HR: 0.86; 95%Cl: 0.79, 0.95 for the GLP-1 (dulaglutide) with the outcome as significant cognitive impairment.

There is no strong association between genetic vascular risk-factors and the development of dementia ( meta-analysis from Edinburg researchers).

In conclusion William Whiteley underlined that “if new evidence is needed for population-wide dementia prevention, then new large trials are necessary. They need to have:

  • sufficiently long follow up
  • a very large number of participants
  • use adjudicated dementia or MCI as an outcome (in the absence of areliable intermediate biomarker)”.

Different roles of vascular mural cell in brain capillary blood flow control

Presented by Martin Lauritzen (Denmark)

At the beginning of his talk, Martin Lauritzen mentioned that vascular signals are the basis for functional neuroimaging and vascular pathology is cause & effect of secondary damage in strokes. On the example of mother and child bonding and examined with MRI, Prof. Lauritzen brought the information that for the bonding process active nerve cells release neurotransmitters, astrocytes release vasodilators from endfeet and mural cells on arterioles and capillaries dilate. One of the significant roles in the neurotransmission plays the sphincter from penetrating arteriole to the cortex. The so called “microvascular inflow tract” plays a significant role and consists of the penetrating arteriole, the sphincter and the pericytes on the capillaries wall, and this microvascular inflow tract controls the vascular blood flow and the can reflect on the images supply.

In MCAO, mice models of the middle cerebral artery occlusion, the weaker signal from capillaries, thicker anastomosis but other large vessels which appear thinner were found, which is speculated to be “a postischemic microvascular vasoconstriction”.

Precapillary sphincters maintain perfusion in the cerebral cortex with a mechanism when sphincter resistance preserves perfusion pressure in the penetrating arteriole and safeguards equal perfusion at all cortical depths (Gruhh st al 2020 Nature Communications).

Cardiac arrest triggers pericyte constriction & astrocyte swelling.

In summary Martin Lauritzen underlined that:

  • Precapillary sphincters do exist in the mouse brain
  • They have higher occurrence in superficial than in deeper cortical layers
  • Sphincters safeguard equal perfusion along the penetrating arteriole
  • They control the flux of red blood cells to the capillaries
  • Cortical spreading depolarizations constrict sphincters and cause vascular entrapment of blood cells
  • In strokes and reperfusion, vascular response are time-variant and heterogenous.

 

 

References

  1. Wardlaw JM, Smith EE, Biessels GJ, Cordonnier C, Fazekas F, Frayne R, Lindley RI, O’Brien JT, Barkhof F, Benavente OR, Black SE, Brayne C, Breteler M, Chabriat H, Decarli C, de Leeuw FE, Doubal F, Duering M, Fox NC, Greenberg S, Hachinski V, Kilimann I, Mok V, Oostenbrugge Rv, Pantoni L, Speck O, Stephan BC, Teipel S, Viswanathan A, Werring D, Chen C, Smith C, van Buchem M, Norrving B, Gorelick PB, Dichgans M; STandards for ReportIng Vascular changes on nEuroimaging (STRIVE v1). Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol. 2013 Aug;12(8):822-38. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(13)70124-8. PMID: 23867200; PMCID: PMC3714437.
  2. Duchesne S, Chouinard I, Potvin O, Fonov VS, Khademi A, Bartha R, Bellec P, Collins DL, Descoteaux M, Hoge R, McCreary CR, Ramirez J, Scott CJM, Smith EE, Strother SC, Black SE; CIMA-Q group and the CCNA group. The Canadian Dementia Imaging Protocol: Harmonizing National Cohorts. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Feb;49(2):456-465. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26197. Epub 2018 Sep 17. PMID: 30635988.
  3. Morrison C, Dadar M, Villeneuve S, Collins L, for Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. White matter hyperintensities may be an early marker for age-related cognitive decline. bioRxiv 2021.09.23.461560; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.23.461560
  4. Connor A. Emdin , Peter M. Rothwell , Gholamreza Salimi-Khorshidi , Amit Kiran , Nathalie Conrad , Thomas Callender , Ziyah Mehta , Sarah T. Pendlebury , Simon G. Anderson , Hamid Mohseni , Mark Woodward and Kazem Rahimi. Blood Pressure and Risk of Vascular Dementia Evidence From a Primary Care Registry and a Cohort Study of Transient Ischemic Attack and Stroke. 2016 https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012658Stroke. 2016;47:1429–1435

<p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – EAN-ESO Joint Symposium: The vascular side of neurodegeneration: a preclinical and clinical perspective first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
ESOC 2022 Session Report – Stroke care in women: from pathophysiology to health care delivery https://eso-stroke.org/esoc-2022-session-report-stroke-care-in-women/ Fri, 06 May 2022 15:13:53 +0000 https://eso-stroke.org/?p=22410 <p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – Stroke care in women: from pathophysiology to health care delivery first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
.flex_column.av-pxfofs-f8cffa300d0abe60229a0238b37e998b{ border-radius:0px 0px 0px 0px; padding:0px 0px 0px 0px; }

By Stela Rutovic

Chairs: Paola Santalucia (Italy), Diana Aguiar de Sousa (Portugal)

The first lecture was presented by Cheryl Bushnell (United States) on the topic, Stroke Care Access: Why are older women still undertreated? Overview of current studies showed that women present with more non-traditional stroke symptoms, and are more likely to have diagnosis of stroke mimics. At the time of stroke onset women are older than men, which is associated with more comorbidities and lower pre-stroke function, as well as more severe strokes. Women are less likely to receive defect- free care, and social determinants of health are major factors in access to care before, during and after stroke.

The second speech on the topic, Women and AF- A dangerous relationship? by Julia Ferrari (Austria) reported that although atrial fibrillation is more common in men, women have higher risk of stroke than men, more debilitating strokes and higher stroke mortality. Women are more likely to experience atypical Afib symptoms, tend to have more frequent and longer- lasting AFib episodes than men, and are less likely to receive oral anticoagulation therapy. Several factors contribute to higher stroke severity in women such as higher rates of total anterior circulation strokes (TACS), smaller vessel diameter and influence of sex hormones on coagulation system.

The third lecture, Carotid stenosis management in women: important considerations for endarterectomy, by Seemant Chaturvedi (United States) discussed approach to carotid revascularization. Results of CREST study showed that women have higher complication rate with CAS compared to men. Indications for carotid revascularization do not differ between genders. The choice of optimal treatment should consider evaluation of patient’s risk profile, anatomic criteria, plaque morphology and medical comorbidities. Atherosclerotic plaques in women are different in morphology and composition compared to men. As a result, women may require different treatment than men. Women tend to be older than men at the time of revascularization. Previous studies have suggested uncertain benefit for asymptomatic women, and reduced benefit for symptomatic women. However, representation of women in carotid trials has been suboptimal and ongoing studies such as CREST 2 and SCORE are needed to provide data on risk/benefit ratio of revascularization vs. intensive medical therapy.

The fourth talk was on Adverse pregnancy events and outcomes- opportunity for primary prevention of stroke by Svetlana Lorenzano (Italy). Pregnancy is associated with many physiological changes which may contribute to occurrence of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO) including hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm delivery, small for gestational age, large for gestational age, placenta abruption, and pregnancy loss. Presence of APOs is associated with increased risk for development of cerebrovascular diseases (CVD), as well as traditional risk factors later in life post-pregnancy. So far, most CVD stratification studies have been conducted in middle aged and older women, who are more likely to have also developed conventional CVD risk factors. Studies in primary prevention of stroke have shown that low-dose aspirin started in early pregnancy reduces risk for some APOs among higher-risk females. It is important to implement healthcare system changes to improve the transition of care after pregnancy, with longer postpartum follow-up care to screen for CVD risk factors and provide CVD prevention counseling.

The last lecture in the session was on the topic of Rare causes of stroke in women, by Diana Aguiar de Sousa (Portugal) who emphasized the need of careful clinical evaluation of every patient with postpartum headache. Although it is a common complaint, clinicians should consider less common causes of secondary headache which are more common in women, such as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST), postpartum preeclampsia and eclampsia, PRES and RCVS. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are major risk factors for maternal stroke. CVST accounts for approximately 1/3 of pregnancy related strokes. In an ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, we should consider that CVST can also be a manifestation of vaccine induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, which is rare side-effect of vaccination against Covid-19. The risk of pregnancy related stroke is also increased in several rare diseases such as fibromuscular dysplasia, moyamoya disease, peripartum cardiomyopathy, choriocarcinoma. Improving outcomes is dependent on proper identification of rare causes of stroke in women and early treatment.

<p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – Stroke care in women: from pathophysiology to health care delivery first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
ESOC 2022 Session Report – Can Artificial Intelligence and Data Science improve Care of Stroke? The art of the possible https://eso-stroke.org/esoc-2022-session-report-2/ Fri, 06 May 2022 12:08:38 +0000 https://eso-stroke.org/?p=22378 <p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – Can Artificial Intelligence and Data Science improve Care of Stroke? The art of the possible first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
.flex_column.av-pxfofs-f8cffa300d0abe60229a0238b37e998b{ border-radius:0px 0px 0px 0px; padding:0px 0px 0px 0px; }

By Pietro Caliandro

Chairs: Prof Iris Grunwald, United Kingdom and Prof William Whiteley, United Kingdom

Artificial intelligence applications in acute stroke recognition 

Presented by prof Helle Collatz Christensen, Denmark

Prof Christensen emphasizes how difficult it is to correctly identify stroke patients during phone calls at the emercengy number and how it is important that operators properly recognize patients and activate the stroke management chain. Only 35% of strokes are recognized at the time of the phone call and this aspect needs to be improved to facilitate access to treatment. Artificial intelligence algorithms can be instructed to recognize a patient as a stroke patient by interpreting the phone calls that are recorded during the distress call. This procedure requires the creation of linguistic models that the algorithm should be able to recognize during phone calls. An important issue is linked to the management of sensitive patient data.

Strengths and weaknesses of current AI tools for stroke imaging diagnosis 

Presented by prof Philip White, United Kingdom

Prof Philip White presented the different AI tools currently able to diagnose stroke by interpreting neuroimaging. He underlined how the introduction of some AI models such as RAPID or VIiz in LVO has made it possible to significantly improve stroke treatment by making revascularization times faster and therefore more effective. Prof White underlines that AI tools are a great promise as decision support tools but caution is required in its use because we need regulatory rules and more robust evidence.

Artificial intelligence and big data in stroke prevention due to AF 

Presented by prof Signild Åsberg, Sweden

Prof Åsberg began his interesting presentation by explaining the concepts of AI and big data. When we talk about big data we refer to a considerable amount of information that must be managed appropriately, while AI represents the set of calculation tools that allow information to be processed. She then demonstrated how these concepts can be applied to improve the identification and treatment of stroke patients in whom atrial fibrillation is suspected. AI algorithms can create predictive models of the presence of atrial fibrillation, identify atrial fibrillation in patients with stroke, and monitor NOAC therapy. She underlined that AI has the potential to improve stroke prevention in AF but its role, circumstances of its application, and the optimal methods need to be defined.

Computational modelling of acute stroke therapy 

Professor Alfons Hoekstra, Netherlands

Professor Hoekstra illustrated the concept of in silico trial and highlighted how AI algorithms can be used to create virtual patient cohorts in which to define the localization and the extent of the ischemic lesion, the type of revascularization treatment to which they are subjected and evaluate the outcome based on the results of real clinical trials such as MR-CLEAN. A similar approach makes it possible to simulate the clinical conditions of the individual patient and predict the evolution in advance based on the information obtained from the trials. Furthermore, Prof Hoekstra highlighted how modeling tools can be useful for designing new real clinical trials.

Looking to the future – AI tools in rehabilitation and re-integration 

Professor Christian Gerloff, Germany

Professor Christian Gerloff begins his stimulating report by recalling the results of NETS trial which highlighted the lack of efficacy of tDCS in improving the motor function of the upper limb in stroke patients. He invites us to reflect on the possible causes that led to this result and underlined how the location of the lesion, skull and skin thicknesses, different strutural anatomy, different co-morbiditie and so on may have prevented the effectiveness of tDCS since the stimulus parameters rwere not personalised according to subjective characteristics of the patient. AI can be a powerful mean of calculation which, based on typical elements of the individual subject, can allow us to customize the stimulation parameters. He then illustrated how this personalization can be applied to rehabilitation approaches such as upper limb support tools that can be customized by integrating multiple data recorded by motion sensors positioned on the patient’s upper limb. The last example presented is the application of AI as a tool for predicting the outcome after the recanalization procedure in a “real world” population and not selected as that typical of clinical trials.

Artificial intelligence increasingly enters our daily life and its use in the treatment of stroke is a frontier to be explored. It is not a question of delegating the physician’s function to an algorithm, but implementing the tools available to the physician in order to make increasingly personalized and effective therapeutic choices. Artificial intelligence applied to stroke must be a patient-centric and privacy-preserving tool whose development requires the involvement of physicians, patients and caregivers in order to meet the needs of the end user.

 

<p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – Can Artificial Intelligence and Data Science improve Care of Stroke? The art of the possible first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
ESOC 2022 Session Report – ESC-ESO Joint Symposium: Evaluation of cardiac source of stroke https://eso-stroke.org/esoc-2022-session-reportcardiac-source-of-stroke/ Fri, 06 May 2022 08:53:40 +0000 https://eso-stroke.org/?p=22373 <p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – ESC-ESO Joint Symposium: Evaluation of cardiac source of stroke first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
.flex_column.av-pxfofs-f8cffa300d0abe60229a0238b37e998b{ border-radius:0px 0px 0px 0px; padding:0px 0px 0px 0px; }

By Dr. Inna Lutsenko, ESO Social Media and PR Committee

@inna_lutsenko

 

Chairs: Marta Rubiera (Spain) and Wolfram Döhner (Germany)

How can I see inside the heart? The basics of POCUS assessment in neurologist’s hands

Theodoros Karapanayiotides from Greece opened the session of collaborative Symposium the ESO and the European Society of Cardiology. He started his talk with an introduction of “POCUS” – point of care ultrasound, a portable device, which does not make neurologists depend on the radiology department in the cases when an immediate ultrasound diagnosis is necessary. With a POCUS a patient may be scanned while in an ambulance on the way to an emergency room or even in remote areas. The advantage of the POCUS is its availability in neurological departments. POCUS is not a full cardiac examination, a semi qualitative, but permits to estimate the left/right ventricle size in the parasternal long axis. Common pathologies, which might be diagnosed with a POCUS are

  • heart failure with an enlargement of the left atrium in a four chamber view, confirming with the global hypokinesia of the left atrium,
  • “ballooning deformation of the heart” – Takotsubo cardiomyopathy when heart changes its shape in the so called “octopus trap”
  • Constrictive cardiomyopathy with a total collapse of left ventricle,
  • apical left ventricular thrombus
  • aortic arch in suprasternal view, where large atheromas could be detected in the ascending and descending aorta,
  • and even the distensibility and diameter of vena cava with central venous pressure could be measured.

POCUS is not used though for the PFO diagnostics, in these cases we should refer the patient to a cardiologist with the use of the transesophageal ultrasound. Theodoros Karapanayiotides concluded that POCUS is not intended for full investigation of cardiogenic/cryptogenic stroke, but this is an extension/complement to physical examination, which could provide rapid answers to specific questions.

 

Troponin elevation in acute stroke: when to worry when to wait

Jan Scheitz from Germany started his talk with a clinical case with a 77 years old female, having a right MCA syndrome with NIHSS 7 and onset-to-admission time 12 hours. She had diabetes, her vital signs were normal and ECG was unspecific and troponin was elevated in admission (hs-c TnT 70 ng/L (5-times ↑ URL). The question was raised whether it is an acute myocardial infarction and how to proceed. Jan Scheitz reminded us that troponin is a special biomarker for the condition of the heart contraction and it could reflect any heart pathology, such as myocardial damage and necrosis. High sensitivity troponin helps us to reveal the heart changes in the general population.

What do we have if we look closely at the patients with elevated troponin level before sending the patient to the CT lab? In the The TRoponin ELevation in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TRELAS) Study which was done in Charite, Berlin, among 2,123 consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients prospectively screened at two tertiary hospitals, 13.7% had cTn elevation (>50ng/l). Further studies are needed to clinically identify the minority of patients with AIS and angiographic evidence of a culprit lesion. In a case of the elevated troponin level in acute ischemic steroke Jan recommends as a first step to differentiate acute or chronic myocardial injury. In case of an acute stroke (hs-cTn ↑ (> 99th Percentile) we should suspect stroke-associated myocardial injury.

Characteristics associated with post-stroke troponin elevation:

  1. Older age, burden of cardiovascular risk factors,
  2. Chronic kidney disease,
  3. Presence of structural and coronary heart disease:
  1. History of CAD, AFIB, Heart Failure
  2. Correlates with LF-EF, WMA, ECG (QT c time, repolarization changes)
  3. Stroke severity, embolic infarct pattern, stroke lesion site.

To summarize: neurologists should differentiate acute and chronic injury and for this to lead serial troponin measurements. In case of chronic myocardial injury, re-stratify vascular risk profile and perform (outpatient) cardiac assessment. In acute myocardial injury – establish cause in a timely manner. Use conventional risk schemes and cardiac imaging to stratify risk of type 1 myocardial infarction.

What the heart hides: How to perform basic and advanced cardiac monitoring in your stroke unit

In his presentation, Martin Köhrmann from Germany underlined that cardiac monitoring includes: evaluation of biomarkers (CHD, CAD, MI), evaluation of structural changes and function (heart ultrasound), evaluation of vasculature if needed and evaluation of electric changes (ECG). Stroke Arrhythmia Monitoring Database (SAMBA) was a prospective, monocentric study with 641 patients from the Stroke Unit. Daily standardized rhythm analysis of acquired ECG data was done. SAMBA consisted of several substudies: SAMBA-SR: detection of Arrhythmias (Kurka et al. Stroke; Kallmunzer et al. Stroke; Seifert et al. J Neuol), SAMBA-AF: detection of atrial fibrillation (Kallmunzer et el.; Stroke), SAMBA HR: clinical impact of heart rate dynamics (Kallmunzer et al.; J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis.) and Impact on Early Repolarization Pattern (Bobinger et al.; Clin Res Cardiol).

Standardized Algorithm for ECG analysis should include:

  • 24-h spectrum of HR dynamics
  • Identification of drops and raises > 20/min
  • Changes in width of spectrum
  • Tachycardia > 120/min and Bradycardia < 40/min
  • Automatically detected arrhythmias and alarms

Arrhythmia after Stroke:

  • 25% of all patients have relevant arrhythmia
  • 24% of these are clinically evident
  • 77% direct therapeutic consequences (1 CPR, 13 pacemaker/ICD, medication)
  • Tachycardic > bradycardic
  • Clearly time dependent after stroke
  • Predictors: Age, NIHSS on admission.

Biomarkers of Cardiac and Vascular Thrombogenicity and Stroke Risk

Presented by Magnus Bäck, Sweden

Several mechanisms take part in a cardiac thrombogenicity: endothelial dysfunction, vasoconstriction, thrombosis, inflammation, smooth muscle proliferation, biomarkers of inflammation: IL-6, CCRP, n-3, PUFA, coagulation and platelet aggregation with elevated D-dimers, fibrinogen, etc. Biomarkers can also distinguish the source of thrombus.

Left atrium thrombogenicity can be evaluated by ultrasound monitoring. Cardiac thrombogenicity can be systemic. In the center is inflammation that can help to distinguish cardiac and vascular thrombogenicity.

CRP is higher in non-cardioembolic cases. Omega-3-fatty acids in atherosclerosis can be biomarkers for inflammation. DHA fatty acids decreased the risk of ischemic stroke. DPA decreases the risk of cardioembolic stroke.

Stroke prevention in cardiac interventions: TAVI, ablations.

Presented by Jan Kovac, United Kingdom

Heart interventions which coil lead to the acute brain injury are mechanical thrombectomy (pivotal, but not limited to), LAA Closure, embolic protection for Cardiac Interventions and ablations. Postulated Mechanism is the reduction of the left atrial appendage blood flow from dysrhythmia. AF slows LAA blood flow and disrupts laminar flow. More complex LAA internal characteristics such as “cauliflower” morphology puts even low CHA2DS2 – VASc score AF patients at significantly higher embolic risk than the simpler chicken wing or windsock morphologies. There are 90% nonvalvular atrial fibrillation related emboli detected in left atrial appendage closure. Most of the atrial fibrillation comes from the left atrial appendage.

Can pulmonary vein isolation (PVI, AF Ablation) prevent Stroke?

Historical studies such as AFFIRM/RACE showed no difference in risk of stroke between rate and rhythm control strategies for AF. There are multiple observational studies demonstrating a reduced incidence of stroke post-ablation (Bunch et al./Korean National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) database). Meta-analyses also supported the reduced stroke risk post ablation (although in the majority of studies included, anticoagulation was continued post-ablation). Randomized Prospective studies demonstrated that there is no randomized prospective data to suggest ablation is associated with a reduction in risk of stroke (CABANA trial). There are several ongoing studies LAA vs NOACs: CHAMPION – AF clinical trial, PFO trial.

Heart Brain Interventionist 2022 (And Beyond):

  • Cardiology is moving beyond boundaries of heart disease
  • Stroke is often related to heart conditions
  • Stroke prevention and treatment is multidisciplinary
  • Several New Skills required for all specialties
  • Cooperation and pathway access requires collaboration of all stakeholders
  • Important issue of training quality and outcome control
  • Stroke Specialist – Referrer, Gate Keeper and Quality Controller!

<p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – ESC-ESO Joint Symposium: Evaluation of cardiac source of stroke first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
ESOC 2022 Session Report – ESMINT-ESO Joint Symposium: Minimizing the risks of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage following reperfusion treatments https://eso-stroke.org/esoc-2022-session-report-esmint/ Thu, 05 May 2022 13:15:20 +0000 https://eso-stroke.org/?p=22361 <p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – ESMINT-ESO Joint Symposium: Minimizing the risks of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage following reperfusion treatments first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
.flex_column.av-pxfofs-f8cffa300d0abe60229a0238b37e998b{ border-radius:0px 0px 0px 0px; padding:0px 0px 0px 0px; }

By Zdravka Poljakovic

Chairs Prof Didier Leys and Prof Peter Schellinger

This interesting and underrepresented topic was introduced with actual data about blood pressure regulation in acute stroke and especially during endovascular procedures. As we miss evidence-based data, we eagerly await results from two studies – DETERMINE and INDIVIDUATE targeting the mean arterial pressure values in stroke and during endovascular procedures.

In any case, what we know by now is that during the procedures not only the modality of anesthesia, but blood pressure maintenance is maybe even more important. We must take into account the pathophysiological differences between higher/lower BP and the state of blood vessels, being recanalized or not. A Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care stresses therefore the importance of dedicated teams, as for now techniques are variable and still no consensus on the choice of preferred medications has been made. Especially important is BP management – before, during and after the procedure and in this field, we lack data at all, or we have just low quality of data. We do know about some outcomes if we have increased BP – like the fact that every 10 mmHg increase in the mean BP in the first 24 hours after EVT rises 14% probability of early neurological deterioration, 20% probability of sICH, diminishes 13% probability of favorable functional outcome, and 3 Mo functional improvement and raises 15% probability of all-cause mortality. What we also know analyzing the data of recent 7 studies is that values of BP in the studies varies a lot during the procedure although being more consistent after the procedure. Furthermore, we are aware of importance of increased BP, but also that hypotension can be even more dangerous. In conclusion – we do not know what optimal BP is especially during the endovascular procedures, and we are still awaiting the results of ongoing RCTs.

Use and type of antiplatelet agents and other adjunctive therapies

Bob Roozenbeek

In acute treatment of ischemic stroke, we have most data about Aspirin and all meta-analysis did not show any other drug being more effective although the studies we cite most date from 1997 (CAST and IST) said prof Roozenbeek in his introduction. Next question is about early administration of ASA in patients treated with alteplase where some studies showed better final outcome but more early hemorrhagic complications. Finally, when we talk about endovascular treatment, we cannot find any RCT on early administration of ASA after TK. We do have observational studies which showed increased risk of sICH but also a better outcome. The use of heparin in early stroke showed the same results. Furthermore, one post-hoc analysis showed that patients who received periprocedural heparin during thrombectomy had better outcomes. Still, the dosage of heparin during the procedure depends on different centers. Therefore, prof Roozenbeek and his group designed the MR CLEAN MED clinical study investigating thrombectomy and use of ASA and/or heparin during the procedure. After a premature determination of the study, the conclusion was that despite some benefit in outcome, hemorrhagic complications overweight the benefits, so that concomitant use of heparin and ASA during thrombectomy is not to recommend.

What is the impact of cerebral microbleed presence in therapeutic decisions?

Charlotte Cordonnier

Prof Cordonnier started the lecture with some data about the incidence of deep and cortical microbleeds which at least 20 – 30% patients have. Although those finding might increase the risk of sICH it does not statistically influence the outcome of any recanalization procedure. According to guidelines, up to 10 known microbleeds are acceptable for thrombolytic treatment. Let us talk about the risk for hemorrhagic complications, she continued – if there are no microbleeds, the risk to develop hemorrhagic complication is 4.4%, with one microbleed the risk raises to 6.5% and with more than ten it is up to the 46.9%. However, we must distinguish between hemorrhage and symptomatic intracerebral hematoma. Microbleeds lead to more hemorrhagic complications but there is no statistical evidence that in those patients the symptomatic ICH is more prevalent after intravenous thrombolysis. Still, guidelines recommend a careful consideration of thrombolytic therapy if the patient has more then ten microbleeds. However, to final decision we must take more factors in charge, prof Cordonnier recommended. She also confirmed this statement with few interesting clinical cases, showing the real-life situation which often do not follow the guidelines. Finally, we have also to take into the consideration that we do know the benefits of reperfusion therapy, but we still do not know the exact risk of microbleeds, as we lack RCTs. Also, there is no recommendation of a need to perform an MRI in order to check the number of microbleeds before thrombolysis. In final thoughts prof Cordonnier suggested that it may be reasonable to skip thrombolysis in patients who have a combination of more than ten microbleeds, obvious small vessel disease and superficial siderosis.

Pre-treament with intravenous thrombolysis before endovascular thrombectomy. Is the benefit worth the risk?

Jonathan Coutinho

Talking about this question, we have – as we always as clinicians should – answer one question: what is the expected benefit and what is the expected risk of this particular therapy in this particular patient, prof Coutinho stated in the beginning of his talk. He emphasized that guidelines are clear and useful, but our patients can unfortunately be “out” of guidelines. Talking about guidelines, he continued, we have now at least 6 RTCs which confirmed that intravenous thrombolysis must be given to any patient who fulfils the criteria, even if thrombectomy is planned, and that this “bridging” therapy shows even some benefits in comparison to thrombectomy alone. To make it more precise, the studies showed absolute difference in favor of intravenous thrombolysis + endovascular treatment (in outcome, mortality and even in successful reperfusion rate) in spite of the higher risk for sICH. The big advantage will come from the IRIS collaboration, where members of all six trials are working together in order to analyze and discuss more data from mentioned studies, taking into the consideration also some other parameters which are important in clinical practice, like blood pressure, localization of the occlusion, presence of tandem occlusion etc., etc.…Finally, some more data will also come from the new studies with other reperfusion strategies (like new fibrinolytics as Tenecteplase, like intraarterial thrombolysis, treatment in mobile stroke units, or use of neuroprotection). At the end, and for now, we have to work according the results and guidelines which recommend i.v.rTPa for any suitable patient.

Do procedural approaches including selection of catheters, number of passes reduce ICH risk?

Sarah Power

The lecture of prof Power dealt with the impact of endovascular approach especially of endovascular techniques, tools, and methods on hemorrhagic complications risk. First topic was about number of passes where several observational studies and sub analysis were presented, with a conclusion that more passes give more risk, and that the “cut-off” number is obviously three passes. Considering first pass effect, the studies showed that any hemorrhage is significantly lower after only first pass, however, sICH incidence showed no difference, being probably due to other factors. The rate of SAH is 5.43 but just 1.84 are symptomatic, and more than three passes increase the risk of SAH as well. Considering the effect of anesthesia on ICH, prof Power emphasized, there is no difference in risk of ICH if general anesthesia or conscious sedation was used, which was confirmed in 5 RCTs. Guiding catheter type did also not influence the risk – which is in overall about 5% – 6% – but it is worth to mention that blind catheter interventional group had less ICH, but also more patients with first pass effect. Considering thrombectomy technique direct aspiration had less hemorrhagic complications. Different types of catheters however did not make a difference. Finally, a very important information came from studies who analyzed risk of hemorrhagic complications after ACI stenting and which came to conclusion that antithrombotic which are routinely given as a prevention of thrombotic incidence did not increase the risk of hemorrhagic complications. So at the end, prof Power could conclude that some factors during endovascular procedure, and especially number of passes, can influence the risk of hemorrhagic complications for the patient.

Discussion was at the end of the session with a number of questions put also on-line. Maybe the most provocative questions were about association between microbleeds and cortical siderosis, or the way of applying i.v. rtPa before and during the endovascular treatment where most of the lecturers agreed to give the full dosage of alteplase even in case of complete recanalization on the angiography. Interesting discussion also developed considering the blood pressure regulation. The conclusion from the chairmen was that the session was very clinically orientated as well as of great benefit for everyday practice and problems which we face in treating acute stroke.

<p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – ESMINT-ESO Joint Symposium: Minimizing the risks of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage following reperfusion treatments first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
ESOC 2022 Session Report – Leveling up stroke care in Europe – Removing inequality https://eso-stroke.org/esoc-2022-session-report-leveling-up-stroke-care-in-europe-removing-inequality/ Wed, 04 May 2022 18:36:11 +0000 https://eso-stroke.org/?p=22334 <p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – Leveling up stroke care in Europe – Removing inequality first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
.flex_column.av-pxfofs-f8cffa300d0abe60229a0238b37e998b{ border-radius:0px 0px 0px 0px; padding:0px 0px 0px 0px; }

By Francesco Correa

Chairs Serefnur Öztürk (Turkey), Cristina Tiu (Romania)

This session was comprised of six talks. The first one was on inequity in access to stroke care in Europe: overlook based on mappings given by Urs Fischer (Switzerland). In 2020 and 2019 the pandemic had a large impact in Europe, data are starting point. What type of stroke societies and support organization do we have in Europe to monitor any progress ? Mapping was the first aspect and 53 societies were identified. National stroke registries are not available in all countries. He pointed out that some progress in acute stroke care in Europe was obtained for both IVY and EVT in a group of countries. The figures available were obtained and together with the global burden of diseases study data. The GBD data are available for 2016 and can hardly be compared to 2019 which saw a peculiar trend. The 2019 saw large variabilities all over europe. Central European and Scandinavian countries had higher performance of procedures. A large gap needs to be filled all over Europe. Both 2019 and 2020 saw no major drop of procedures. Comparing 2016 to 2019 IVT in proportion was improving for EVT as well the trend is encouraging. Inequalities are still large but according to incidence the pandemic did not lead to large drop. The relative trend is encouraging. Still many patients are untreated.

The second speech was on Stroke risk factors in migrants – Regional or global effects and potential solution by Serefnur Öztürk (Turkey) the speaker reported how stroke in migrante is a growing problem. The human kind from ancient times saw migration as a chance to survival. Global trends from WHO reported how 82 millions people from developing countries are moving to other areas of the planet to find better chances. Turkey has a particular burden of around 6 million displaced people from Middle East. From 2014 to 2023 the trend is steadily increasing. Life conditions are very heavy for this population. Cerebrovascular diseases are on the top conditions that may affect these populations. The pattern of risk factors is similar to the general populations. A health care coverage is not always guaranteed for migrants this will bring to a lost chance of vascular risk factors control. Together with stroke also seizures and headache are usually reported as frequent neurological conditions. Migration medicine is a field of interest for the health care community.

The next talk was on Cerebrovascular disease in homeless city dwellers, a growing universal problem. Speaker was Thalia Field from Vancouver, Canada. Social determinants of health must be taken into account when treating stroke. Low socio economic level predicts the prognosis in manu conditions. Precarious housing is more frequent then expected. Leading to spec of pattern of infectious diseases exposure, mental health problerms etc etc. Traumatic brain injury TBI is more frequent in homeless subjects (and vice versa) . They are more vulnerable to assaults and injuries. She cited the hotel study 2008-2014 demonstrated on 371 subjects a high mortality around 18% and high rate of co-morbidities.The white matter abnormalities as well as brain atrophy were more severe in HOTEL study population respect to other controls. Specific project may reach population at risk to reduce harm.

The forth speech entitled, Income inequalities in stroke incidence and mortality, followed by Søren Paaske Johnsen (Denmark) socioeconomic problems leads to higher risks of stroke. Stroke mortality is decreasing but low-medium income countries had higher DALYs burden. What explain the disparities. ? The deprivation index may help understanding, a Uk study demonstrated in 2018 how most deprived citizens a 3 fold increase of cerebrovascular risk. Danish studies JaHa 2014 also showed how risk of stroke was associated with annual income irrespective from etnicity. Education is connected with employment as well as income. Poverty will reduce chances of education and employment. quality of care delivered is influenced by socioeconomic aspects. Still the gap is large according to a paper in press in stroke by Buus et Al found how low income is connected with lower chance of getting appropriate stroke treatment mostly for late arrival in the hospital. The urgent tasks to reduce the gap are stroke awareness campaign and social support to most fragile subjects.

The next speech was about Strategies to improve access to stroke care in rural and remote areas was given by Inna Lutsenko from Kyrgyzstan. She opened with the key processes involved from initial assessment and rapid transport issues. The notification to the EMS system may be delayed. The income of the country may influence the quality of EMS. Not all countries have access to stroke therapy. Acute stroke ready hospitals must be implemented with algorithms to simplify decision making process. Telemedicine may fill the gap from rural areas and comprehensive stroke centers. Rural communities with low population density face limited local resources.Central Asia distribution of stroke services was discussed, reporting large variability. Data from a survey showed around 7 hrs vs 44 hrs as onset to door time for stroke patients in suburban vs rural areas. Specific education programmes were undertaken for the population and paramedical personnel leading to an improvement of the decision process. The survey also showed statistical significant shortening of the hospital arrival of patients were observed. Involving all the stakeholders (medical, paramedic, population) together with telemedicine will reduce the gap and reduce stroke burden.

The last talk was on Stroke Care in unprecedented times: taking care of patients and health-workers in conflict zones and emergency settings from Francesca R. Pezzella from Rome (Italy.) A complex mechanisms underlies health care in emergencies. From earthquakes to war and pandemics in large parts of the planet compromises access to stroke care. Access to hospital beds may be compromised by above mentioned conditions. Also treatment chances may be compromised by emergency settings. In absence of emergency plans improvisation is the rule. The latest threat in Europe is a conflict In literature data on non communicable diseases NCD in emergencies are limited. Impact of war in Ukraine may help understanding effects on stroke care. The first 30-90 days the focus is according to available data on life threatening conditions. The second phase called “continuing the response” the later chronic reaction to ensure access to other diseases. Stroke needs to be included in emergency preparedness plans.

<p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – Leveling up stroke care in Europe – Removing inequality first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
ESOC 2022 Session Report – Acute Stroke care delivery: difficulties but also improvements imposed by the COVID-19 era https://eso-stroke.org/esoc-2022-session-report-covid/ Wed, 04 May 2022 18:24:28 +0000 https://eso-stroke.org/?p=22329 <p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – Acute Stroke care delivery: difficulties but also improvements imposed by the COVID-19 era first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
.flex_column.av-pxfofs-f8cffa300d0abe60229a0238b37e998b{ border-radius:0px 0px 0px 0px; padding:0px 0px 0px 0px; }

By Francesco Correa

The session chaired by Marialuisa Zedde and Robin Lemmens started with a first speech given by Richard Perry (UK), Queen Square on the topic Thrombotic and cerebrovascular complications of COVID-19 which discussed the direct effects of covid induced coagulopathy together with the latest updates offered by recent publications available in the field. What clinicians saw is not a simple DIC due also to direct damage with invasion of the virus on their CNS and a related cytokine storm. Smallar case series are available in literature with typical large artery thrombosis. The first observation reported an increase of stroke admission during the first wave in Italy. Different data were observed in later studies with a fall of mild stroke admission. Excepted for a rise of median stroke severity. Others provocative studies suggested a protective effects of covid from a NYC study. Case series demonstrated incidence percentages between 0,09 up to 5 %. Controlled studies demonstrated higher risk in the first 14 days after covid.

SETICOS study showed more severe stroke cases according to NIHSS scores not an higher risks of LVOs respect to controls. This study showed a broader distribution of d-dimer levels than controls and the stroke outcome was worse than controls with a doubled mortality.

The second speech on COVID-19 and cerebral venous thrombosis by Andrei Alexandrov (United States) showed interesting data from NYC in hospitals converted to covid with fast mortality trends changes through time and neurological symptoms were very common among COVID19 patients. The study done in NYC metropolitan area reported 12 cases of CVT with incidence of 8.8 : 10000 while in Singapore with a local better control of the pandemic were found 6 cases after covid and with 83:10.000 and a rate of post vaccine CVT of 2.5:10.000. was pointed out a potential over use of heparin with harmful consequences a case study reported 552 world wide cases while another Germany study found post vaccine CVT with 0.55 on all vaccines with up to 1.53:100.000 higher incidence while chadoX vaccine was considered. Vector based vaccines showed higher risk of CVT / TTC and related complications with increased mortality.

The third speech was on “New adaptations to accelerate for reperfusion therapies in the COVID-19 era” by Amrou Sarraj (United States) He reported how hypercoagulability effects on COVID 19 may affect delivery of thrombolysis with a global drop in hospitalization, also an 11% drop in the use of r-Tpa. Also endovascular trombetto was reduced 19% as cause of hospitalization.

Literature studies showed how during the study period taken int account less procedures were done. The use of RAPID software was reduced by 39% as well. How to treat stroke on the covid era was a relevant topic on how to maintain stroke care. Prehospital triage was the first point together with the improvement of the use of Telestroke, therapy pathways alse needed to be remodulated,. Obtaining a consent to participation in clinical trials was also problematic and telephone consent was used together with e-consent. In COVID times many case series demonstrated good outcome of mechanical procedure with a decline on enrollment.

The forth talk was on Intracerebral hemorrhage: implications for management in patients infected by SARS-CoV2 by Barbara Casolla (France) she pointed out how the causal link between COVID19 and cerebrovascular events is not clear. Also ICH may be affected from COVID19 between 1.14 to 3% is the range of incidence of ICH in covid 19 while cosidering all types of ICH 7-12%

The potential mechanisms is connected with endothelial and inflammatory processes that effects the blood brain barriers. Those suffering from ICH during covid19 demonstrated higher levels of inflammatory markers at admission : such as leukocytes, CRP, D-dimer with a worse outcome. Other reported the use of anticoagulants in ICH during COVID 19 more often finding of a lobar ICH. With often a contemporary hyperacute growth of hematoma volume. The use of anticoagulants in COVID19 population bring a 5 fold increase of ICH due probably to an underlying coagulopathy. ECMO for COVID19 demonstrated a 6 fold increase of ICH due to underlying specific conditions.

The last speech of the session was on the Adaptations of stroke unit care and organization: lessons from a pandemic to benefit long term care by Apostolos Safouris (Greece) he reported how cunfuse pandemic plans showed the weakness of many health care systems during the first waves. The post COVID19 health care community now is using as countermeasures the following options: Big data analysis, specific adaptation of stroke services, the larger use of telemedicine, escalation protocols, empowerment of the population with increased informal communication between patients and phisicians.

<p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – Acute Stroke care delivery: difficulties but also improvements imposed by the COVID-19 era first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
ESOC 2022 Session Report – ESMINT-ESO Joint Symposium: Persistent frontiers facing acute reperfusion therapies https://eso-stroke.org/esoc-2022-session-report-esmint-eso-joint-symposium-persistent-frontiers-facing-acute-reperfusion-therapies/ Wed, 04 May 2022 16:45:25 +0000 https://eso-stroke.org/?p=22319 <p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – ESMINT-ESO Joint Symposium: Persistent frontiers facing acute reperfusion therapies first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
.flex_column.av-pxfofs-f8cffa300d0abe60229a0238b37e998b{ border-radius:0px 0px 0px 0px; padding:0px 0px 0px 0px; }

By Zdravka Poljakovic

Chairs:  Prof Diederik Dippel and Prof Jens Fiehler

Endovascular thrombectomy for mid-sized artery occlusions

Presented by prof Raul Nogueira, United States

To start this topic, prof Nogueira emphasized how crucial it is to understand anatomy and pathophysiology of “medium vessels” – which is very complex and sometimes unexpected. Furthermore, even the definition of “mid-sized” can be confusing. Looking at clinical trials, a HERMES meta-analysis on 130 patients with M2 occlusion showed no clear benefit. However, occlusion of mid-sized arteries represents nearly 40% of all ischemic strokes therefore being a big clinical problem. So, prof Nogueira stated, this problem remains important, especially if we take into the consideration that intravenous thrombolysis achieves reperfusion in just 50% of patients.

In conclusion, by making the decision of treating mid-sized artery occluson endovascularly or not, we should balance vascular anatomy (tortuosity>caliber>distance) vs tissue status and disability, clinical-imaging mismatch and regional eloquence.  Furthermore a right therapeutic “tool” has to be chosen for the treatment, which makes the decision extremely individualized.

New thrombolytics for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke

Presented by prof Georgios Tsivgoulis, Greece

Prof Tsivgoulis started the lecture with short description of Tenecteplase and its pharmacokinetic characteristics, as his lecture was actually about Tenecteplase only.Tenecteplase is the third generation of fibrinolytics, approved already for myocardial infarction, having benefits considering safety as well as the way of administration in comparison to alteplase. EXTEND-IA TNK trial published in 2018 was the first promising study in acute stroke showing better outcome without safety concerns for the investigational group of patients. NOR-TEST trial metaanalysis published in 2019 showed however higher haemorrhagic rate in comparison with alteplase, but in dosage of 0.4 mg/kg. ACT trial presented today with dosage of 0.25mg/kg, proved non-inferiority of Tenecteplase to alteplase, but also the clear benefit for patients with large vessel occlusion. Real-word data showed also promising results in this group of patients. So at the moment we have no final data and we still wait the result of a Tenecteplase study in wake-up stroke which will be presented here on Fridey.

Endovascular thrombectomy for mild stroke syndromes

Christos Krogias, Germany

Interesting clinical data show that at least 30% of LVO have mild (NIHSS) clinical picture. However, again meta-analysis shows that patients with NIHSS less than 10 do not benefit from endovascular therapy. In any case, most minor strokes will have good prognosis, so routine endovascular treatment is not warranted. However very early after the initial symptomatology, every fifth patient with mild stroke deteriorate. In 2019. a paper comparing medical management vs mechanical thrombectomy did not show significant difference between those two groups. Meta analysis of four studies showed also that symptomatic ICH was more often present in a thrombectomy group. Two recently published studies showed no difference in outcome, and especially to mention is the study from Seners and al. published in 2020 with the same result but a difference in outcome if we consider distal and proximal occlusion, showing much better results for proximal occlusion and clinically mild stroke. Not to forgot is a collateral status and thrombus length which can predict early neurological deterioration and help in decision for endovascular treatment. At the end, prof Krogias emphasizes, much larger randomized studies are necessary!

Reperfusion therapies in patients with unfavorable imaging features (low ASPECTS, poor collaterals): who, when and how?

Jens Fiehler, Germany

The crucial question posed by prof Fiehler was what to do with patients with low ASPECT score and bad collateral score as in some cases they can still do good or much better with endovascular treatment. More confusing is also the fact that in patients with poor ASPECT score and poor collaterals if reperfusion (recanalization) is achieved, edema formation can be limited. Important information comes from a study published by Broocks and coll. published in 2022. Namely his results show that low ASPECT score leads to more symptomatic hemorrhages if combined with thrombolysis. It seams that also age plays a role – namely patients with low ASPECTs and large infarct core if being young (younger than 75 years of age) still benefit from endovascular treatment in contrast with patients who are older than 75 years when endovascular treatment shows not only no benefit but even a very high mortality rate. Comparison of six “large core” trials is still unconclusive, and ongoing randomized studies should be continued prof Fiehler concluded.

Acute stroke reperfusion treatment in the elderly and those with multiple co-morbidities – evidence, and how I do it.

Keith Muir, United Kingdom

Elderly people represent practical problem in our clinical practice as they are clearly underrepresented in clinical trials although we would all agree that age should not affect our treatment decision said prof Muir in his introduction. Talking about the intravenous thrombolysis, we should take in account not only the age, but also the initial severity of stroke as well as the time of stroke onset. Let us the add comorbidities which can severely influence the outcome and everything gets much more complicated he claimed. When we talk about thrombectomy, again in initial studies, older age groups were underrepresented and had fewer comorbidities. Certainly, advanced neuroimaging might help. So, at the end, age alone is not a contraindication to recanalization therapy, however comorbidities and combination of factors does influence the outcome. In conclusion, according to prof Muir, a good way for helping the decision is to ask yourself whether your patient would be included in randomized clinical trial and if not, are there enough data to support a favorable risk-benefit balance whereas time-window, prior functionality and comorbidity as well as imaging data do make a difference.

Finally, after excellent and challenging lectures as well as a colorful discussion, the main questions covered with this topic, namely use of Tenecteplase in acute stroke, endovascular treatment of mid-sized vessel, mild stroke, or in patients with low ASPECTs and poor collaterals or recanalization treatment in general in elderly chronically ill patients, still remain unanswered and have clearly to be decided individually, which makes eventual guidelines extension challenging.

ESOC 2022

<p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report – ESMINT-ESO Joint Symposium: Persistent frontiers facing acute reperfusion therapies first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
ESOC 2022 Session Report -ICH: Where are we? https://eso-stroke.org/esoc-2022-session-report-ich/ Wed, 04 May 2022 09:42:28 +0000 https://eso-stroke.org/?p=22259 <p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report -ICH: Where are we? first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>
.flex_column.av-pxfofs-f8cffa300d0abe60229a0238b37e998b{ border-radius:0px 0px 0px 0px; padding:0px 0px 0px 0px; }

By Rajiv Advani

Chair: Carlo Cereda and Charlotte Cordonnier

D. Staykov – Perihemorrhagic edema: the hidden enemy

ICH in its acute and subacute phases, especially where a large volume is involved, is often associated with perihemorrhagic edema. Studies have shown that the volume of ICH is congruent with the volume of edema. Perihemorrhagic edema develops due to multiple pathophysiological factors; inflammation, damage to the blood-brain barrier, generation of free radicals and the toxicity of blood breakdown products. Perihemorrhagic edema can be seen up to ten days after acute ICH and is usually most pronounced during the first 7 days, this poses the question of when to evaluate edema. Potential treatments are pharmacological and involve the use of hypertonic saline, mannitol, glycerol, sorbitol, medically induced hypothermia; however all unproven at RCT level. Surgical treatment is being evaluated, where large ICH volumes are randomised to hemicraniectomy, the SWITCH trial is actively recruiting. Neuroprotective medications have been promising in animal studies and involve the use of TNF alpha inhibitors, celecoxib, deferoxamine, reactive oxygen species scavenger and can serve as potential future therapies.

N. Sprigg – Hematoma expansion and medical therapies

Hematoma expansion leads to greater risk of death and poorer outcomes for survivors at 3 months. Large ICH volumes (>30ml) tend to enlarge further. Several radiological signs can identify those at risk of hematoma expansion, but none have proven to definitively predict expansion. Non contrast CT signs include the black hole sign, the blend sign, the island sign and on contrast enhanced CT; the spot sign. Anticoagulation reversal for VKA, Dabigatran reversal and Factor Xa inhibitor reversal (currently only in clinical trials in some countries), should be actively used. Trying to administer medication rapidly by keeping the drug in the admissions unit and having point of care devices for INR can improve treatment times. Tranexamic acid (TICH2, STOP-AUST, TRIAGE) was shown to be safe, but showed no significant benefit was seen at 3 month follow up. The PATCH study showed that platelets and FFP are not indicated where surgery is not planned. Desmopressin can serve a surrogate for reversal but hasn’t yet been proven. Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) for ICH is currently being tested in the FASTEST study. Goal directed bundles seem to show the most promise; addressing fever and hyperglycemia as well as anticoagulation reversal and blood pressure management.

K. Klijn – Surgical approaches for ICH

In some parts of the world less than 5% undergo surgery for an ICH, but in other countries almost 40% have surgery. In many Chinese RCTs, medical management isn’t tested as a control arm, where minimally invasive methods are compared to hemicraiectomy. All the RCTs for ICH surgery (STICH, STICH II and MISTIE to name a few) have all been neutral. Surgery in the afore mentioned trials was performed between 28 and 58 hours (median) after admission; early surgery has therefore not been tested. Hematoma expansion is seen commonly seen and therefore challenges the rationale of not performing surgery early. The MISTIE trial showed that a 10% greater chance of improved outcome was seen for each 1ml of ICH that was removed; volume of ICH removed is a key issue. The surgical technique is important to bear in mind: hemicraniectomy has been traditionally used (STICH), however minimally invasive techniques including stereotactic aspiration, mini-craniectomy and endoscopy guided approaches can be used with or without rTPA. DIST (pilot study in the Netherlands), showed that minimally invasive surgery in smaller ICH volumes was safe (10% mortality within 10 days) and served to reduce hematoma volume/expansion. Based on these results the DIST RCT will start randomising patients shortly. Other ongoing trials include MIND, ENRICH, MISICH and EVACUTE.

C. Anderson – Blood pressure management

The current evidence on blood pressure (BP) management in acute ICH are based on a few RCTs. ATACH II and INTERACT2 trials showed neutral and borderline positive respectively. The BASC systematic review showed that all trials, when assessed in a meta-analysis, showed a neutral result for blood pressure reduction. The subgroups in the meta-analysis showed that a goal driven blood pressure reduction, with titration of the BP reducing agent, did lead to a reduction in hematoma expansion. A significant drop in BP can be harmful and therefore titration and continuous monitoring is crucial; adverse outcomes including neurological deterioration and death were seen in large drops in BP. The PATICH trial, used perioperative medical management as per INTERACT2 in addition to minimally invasive surgery showing similar outcomes. INTERACT3, is a stepped wedge trial introducing a bundle of care (SBP < 140mmHg within 1 hour, temperature reduction to < 37.5 degrees Celsius within 1 hour, INR < 1.5 within 1 hour, aggressive management of glycemia) and aims to include 8500 patients and will be closed out this year. INTERACT4 is also ongoing, and results will shed light on the use of nitrates in the prehospital setting.

<p>The post ESOC 2022 Session Report -ICH: Where are we? first appeared on European Stroke Organisation.</p>

]]>