ACC: Cost-benefit of remote monitoring depends on players

Cmio.net: March 29, 2012.

CHICAGO—Calculating the cost-benefit ratio of remote monitoring patients who have implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) depends on many variables, and the answer hinges on who pays and who benefits, said Mark H. Schoenfeld, MD, of Yale University School of Medicine in New Haven, Conn., in a March 24 presentation at the 61st annual American College of Cardiology (ACC) scientific session.

“When you talk about cost-benefit, you have to ask to whom is the cost and to whom is the benefit, and you have to acknowledge there are many individual players,” said Schoenfeld, who has served on guideline committees and expert consensus panels looking at cardiac device monitoring. “There is the individual patient, the healthcare provider, society, taxpayers, third-party payors, government and, of course, industry.” Read More

National Minority Quality Forum
Clinical Trial Engagement Network Map Childhood Obesity MapHIV Z-Atlas: Peripheral Arterial Disease Atlas Map Lung Cancer Index Z-Atlas: Chronic Kidney Disease AFIB Index Cardiometabolic Health Aliance Minority Diabetes Coalition U.S. Diabetes Index County Edition U.S. Diabetes Index Research Edition Medicare Index Medicare Index Stroke Edition About The Minority Stroke Working Group Hepatitis C Disease Index Lead Risk Index Map MRSA StrokePAD Minority Index The South Texas Diabetes Initiative Minority Stroke Consortium YouTube NMQF Videos IPAB Action Center National Health Index

© 2011 National Minority Quality Forum, Inc. All Rights Reserved.