Closure or Medical Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke with Patent Foramen Ovale
Clinical Trials Friday, March 16th, 2012Nejm.org: Anthony J. Furlan, M.D., Mark Reisman, M.D., Joseph Massaro, Ph.D., Laura Mauri, M.D., Harold Adams, M.D., Gregory W. Albers, M.D., Robert Felberg, M.D., Howard Herrmann, M.D., Saibal Kar, M.D., Michael Landzberg, M.D., Albert Raizner, M.D., and Lawrence Wechsler, M.D. for the CLOSURE I Investigators
N Engl J Med 2012; 366:991-999 – March 15, 2012.
BACKGROUND
The prevalence of patent foramen ovale among patients with cryptogenic stroke is higher than that in the general population. Closure with a percutaneous device is often recommended in such patients, but it is not known whether this intervention reduces the risk of recurrent stroke.
METHODS
We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial of closure with a percutaneous device, as compared with medical therapy alone, in patients between 18 and 60 years of age who presented with a cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and had a patent foramen ovale. The primary end point was a composite of stroke or transient ischemic attack during 2 years of follow-up, death from any cause during the first 30 days, or death from neurologic causes between 31 days and 2 years. Read More
